Legal Opinion
Funk v. Ætna Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1938No. 8658PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the appellant as beneficiary under an accident policy issued to Ralph B. Funk by the appellee.
The policy contained the standard provisions required by the statutes of the State of California, chapter 614, § 3, Statutes 1917, p. 958. The first of said provisions reads :N
“This Policy includes the endorsements and attached papers if any, and contains the entire contract of insurance except as it may be modified by the Company’s classification of risks and premium rates in the event that the Insured is injured after having changed his occupation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Business Men's Assur. Co. of America v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Edwards v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Friend v. Business Men's Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- North American Acc. Ins. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938