Legal Opinion

Houserman v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 10, 2004No. 1030587 and 1030789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This medical-malpractice case involves the post-surgical retention within a patient's body of a surgical aid known as a Kerlix brand gauze pad.1 Jennifer Garrett, on June 30, 1995, underwent surgery to reverse a bilateral tubal ligation that had been performed years earlier. This reversal surgery, known as an isthmic-ampullary renanastomosis, is intended to surgically repair the fallopian tube after it has been cut or burned apart in a tubal ligation. The isthmic-ampullary renanastomosis procedure involves delicate microsurgery, made more difficult because the surgical site is located within…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Powell v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Breaux v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ravi v. CoatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ravi v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sorrell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Cobb v. FisherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Ivy v. CarrawaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Houserman v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API