Houserman v. Garrett
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This medical-malpractice case involves the post-surgical retention within a patient's body of a surgical aid known as a Kerlix brand gauze pad.1 Jennifer Garrett, on June 30, 1995, underwent surgery to reverse a bilateral tubal ligation that had been performed years earlier. This reversal surgery, known as an isthmic-ampullary renanastomosis, is intended to surgically repair the fallopian tube after it has been cut or burned apart in a tubal ligation. The isthmic-ampullary renanastomosis procedure involves delicate microsurgery, made more difficult because the surgical site is located within…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Powell v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Breaux v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ravi v. CoatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ravi v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sorrell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Cobb v. FisherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Ivy v. CarrawaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Houserman v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004