Legal Opinion

Paul H. King v. Steve Rice

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 10, 2013No. 67759-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PAUL KING, No. 67759-4-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION, , r> STEVE RICE and BARBARA RICE, individually and the marital community thereof, dba SUNLIGHT CONSTRUCTION, _—' T - ,- . Respondent. FILED: June 10, 2013 U1 Appelwick, J. — King failed to note his tort claims against Rice for trial for over two years after this court remanded the matter to the trial court. Rice requested dismissal for want of prosecution pursuant to CR 41(b)(1). On the facts here, application of CR 41(b)(1) is mandatory. We affirm the trial court's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wiley v. RehakWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. White v. City of Santee (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Snohomish County v. Thorp MeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API