Legal Opinion

State v. Hurt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2007No. 20070081PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Brian Hurt appeals from a criminal judgment following his conditional guilty pleas for one class C felony and one class A misdemeanor count of possessing drug paraphernalia, arguing the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. Hurt argues the probation search of his apartment, under the terms of his roommate’s probation conditions, violated his Fourth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. We hold the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures was not violated when probation officers searched the common areas of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. GatlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. GayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Thornton v. LundDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API