Legal Opinion

Comfort Innovations, LLC v. Haarlander

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 27, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00516Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION COMFORT INNOVATIONS, LLC, Case No. 3:21-cv-00516 Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Judge Richardson v. On appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the THOMAS MICHAEL HAARLANDER, Middle District of Tennessee, Case No. 19-04033 Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Adversary Proc. 19-90178 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The instant matter, as it arises in the captioned district court case, is an appeal and a corresponding cross-appeal from a judgment in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding. Specifically,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API