Legal Opinion

Epperson v. Rosemond

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1950No. Civ. 14498PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DO CLING, J.—In an action for a partnership accounting plaintiff, widow of the decedent Charles A. Epperson, as administratrix of his estate, had judgment against the appellants as surviving partners for $61,772.98.

Decedent and appellants were stockholders in a corporation engaged in the manufacture of bus bodies. The corporate form was abandoned on December 29, 1943, and a partnership agreement was substituted which provided that decedent should receive 20 per cent of the profits. Decedent suffered a stroke of paralysis which kept him from participating in the business and on May 22, 1944,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Katz v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Holzer v. ReadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Promis v. DukeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Hopland Band of Pomo IndiansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v. City of Moreno ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MascottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Traders Etc. Ins. Co. v. Pac. Emp. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Smith v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API