Legal Opinion

Bankers' Surety Co. v. Elkhorn River Drainage Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1914No. 4032PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska; Thos. C. Munger, Judge. Action at law by the Elkhorn River Drainage District against the Bankers’ Surety Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

RINER, District Judge.

This was ah action brought by' the Elk-horn River Drainage District, defendant in error, against the Bankers’ Surety Company, plaintiff in error, upon a bond given to secure the performance of a contract theretofore entered into 'between the Elk-horn River Drainage District and the Standard Drainage Company for .the construction of certain cut-offs along the course of the Elkhorn river, in Dodge and Washington counties, Neb., for the purpose of straightening it and facilitating the passage of water down that stream. For convenience the Elkhorn River Drainage District…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Atlantic Trust & Deposit Co. v. Town of LaurinburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
  3. Salem v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brooks v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Turner v. City of FremontCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. United States v. KanterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API