Legal Opinion

Bain v. Guntersville Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1924No. 8 Div. 481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

It is clear, on elementary principles of law, that the complainant, Bain, has no right, as a purchaser of land from the respondent Walls, to maintain a bill for the cancellation or rescission of ffhe sale of the land by the respondent realty company to Walls, on the ground that the realty company misrepresented to Walls the location of the northern boundary, and so deceived Walls into believing that the tract to be conveyed to him contained several acres of valuable land in the north-west corner, though in fact the deed of conveyance and the plat attached did not include such acreage.

In such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shahan v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Garner, Neville & Co. v. LeverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. Parks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  4. Howle v. North Birmingham Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Manning v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barley v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Bredensteiner v. OviattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API