Legal Opinion

Manning v. Carter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson. Bill by J. H. Carter against D. O. Manning to enforce a vendor’s lien. Cross bill by respondent seeking an abatement of the purchase price because of deliciency in the acreage. From a decree sustaining demurrer to'the cross bill, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SAYRE, J. —

Appellee filed his bill to enforce a vendor’s lien, alleging that he had agreed to sell, and appellant had agreed to buy, a certain tract of land, which is described by metes and bounds in part and in other part according to the government survey, at and for the round sum of $2,800. Appellant paid $500 of the agreed purchase price and was put into possession, and at the same time, in. pursuance of an agreement to that effect, appellee executed a warranty deed and appellant a note for the balance of the agreed purchase price, and these papers were deposited with a bank, with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hodges v. DennySupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Winston v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Shahan v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Dykes v. BottomsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Manning v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Hill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Milton Realty Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. McCreary v. StallworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API