Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Lewis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 25, 1903PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Before Gary, J., Greenville, September, 1902. Action by D. A. Carpenter, receiver, against Samuel C. Lewis et al. From Circuit decree, the defendants appeal. cites: As to the rules of settlement between insolvent building and loan association and borrowing member: 44 S. C., 121; 12 Rich. Eq., 126; 15 S. C., 462; 63 S. C., 537. cites: Questions raised here are res judicata: 61 S. C., 9.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

Statement of facts. — This action was commenced June 17, 1899, by service of the summons and complaint upon the above named Samuel C. Lewis, and similar actions were at the same time commenced against W. N. and Florence Brissey and against S. T. and Maggie Dagnall. The actions were for the foreclosure of three mortgages. It was agreed by counsel as follows: “In consideration of the saving of expense in conducting three appeals in the above stated case, it is hereby agreed between counsel that the appeal shall be taken in the Lewis case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meares v. FinlaysonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  2. Jennings v. ParrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  3. Thompson & Co. v. GillisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  4. Meares v. FinlaysonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Burst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Malcolmson v. Goodhue County National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Smith v. Bath Loan & Building Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  5. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API