Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1998No. 24672Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavis, Chief Justice

This case was appealed by Jordache Enterprises, Inc. and its owners, Joseph Na-kash, Ralph Nakash and Avi Nakash (hereinafter referred to as “Jordache”). Jordache filed an action against the appellee, National Union Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “National”), as a result of National’s refusal to provide coverage for Jordache in other litigation. The action included a claim for bad faith. The circuit court subsequently granted summary judgment to National. The majority opinion held that because of a previous ruling by a New York trial court on the issue of indemnification,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Albany Partners, Ltd. v. Westbrook (In Re Albany Partners, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API