Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Darling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Bill to enjoin foreclosure proceedings. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

James Forbes, the father of the complainants, died October 24, 1871, leaving a last will, the terms of which are as follows:

“First. I do hereby give and devise and bequeath to my wife, Francina Forbes, all of my estate, consisting of my farm, situate in the township of Dayton, aforesaid, and known and described as the north-east quarter of section number thirty (30), in township number thirteen (13) north, range number fourteen (14) west, together with all of my personal estate, consisting of farm implements, teams, stock, grain, etc.
“Second. I do also hereby constitute and appoint my said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Mann v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Tweed v. MetcalfMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Kinney v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Johnson v. Provincial InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Donges's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. DettenthalerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re Hunter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Hollway v. AthertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API