United States v. Holsworth
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COOK, Judge:
The accused contends that two actions by the trial judge were prejudicial to him. First, he maintains that a ruling admitting certain evidence proffered by the Government was improper because the evidence was obtained in violation of an air base regulation; secondly, he contends that fatal *185error was committed when the judge failed to instruct the court members that the offenses of which he was found guilty were not separate for the purpose of punishment. We decide both matters against the accused.
I. The Facts.
A regulation of Hahn Air Base, Germany, provides for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. PosnickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. RiveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- Dumas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- United States v. RushingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. StrozierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.