Legal Opinion

Holcombe v. Fowler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1928No. 8229PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

Relators, W. H. Holcombe and others, composing the Democratic Executive Committee of Upton County, and J. O. Barfield, have filed a motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus against Hon. C. R. Sutton, Judge of the Eighty-third Judicial District, the Clerk of the District Court of that District, and W. C. Fowler, an interested party.

It appears from the petition that on the 9th of August, 1928, W. C. Fowler filed suit in the District Court of Upton County, in which the relators in this action were made defendants. The purpose of that suit was to obtain a writ of mandamus or mandatory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hume v. SchintzTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lacoste v. DuffyTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Wagner v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Pollard v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Fuller v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Manion v. LockhartTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Forbes v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. McCarty v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Economic Opportunities Development Corp. of San Antonio v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API