Legal Opinion

In re Docker-Foster Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1903No. 1,509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On certificate of referee.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

On the several questions argued by counsel, my opinion is briefly as follows:

1. Under the provisions of general order No. 37 (91 Fed. xxxvi, 32-C. C. A. xxxvi), which extend the equity rules of the Supreme Court to “proceedings in equity instituted for the purpose of carrying into-effect the provisions of the act, or for enforcing the rights and remedies given by it,” failure to file an answer to a petition seeking to-expunge a claim justifies a decree pro confesso, under rule 18, carry*191ing the ordinary incidents and consequences of such a decree. The petition…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re WeissmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. In re FelsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1905
  3. In re Goble Boat Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1911
  4. Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. Boyle Furniture Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Knoll v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API