Legal Opinion

Brenman v. Demello

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 30, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

921 A.2d 1110 (2007)

191 N.J. 18

Rena BRENMAN and Mitchell D. Brenman, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Michael DEMELLO and Stephanie Demello, Defendants-Appellants, and

ABC Company, (said name being fictitious and unknown), Defendant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 2006.

Decided May 30, 2007.

Kathleen S. Murphy argued the cause for appellants (Connell Foley LLP, attorneys).

Michael F. Wiseberg argued the cause for respondents (Leonard & Leonard, P.A., attorneys).

Bruce H. Stern argued the cause for amicus curiae, Association of Trial Lawyers-New Jersey (Stark & Stark, P.C. and Pellettieri,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rivera-Soto; Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Green v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. Bender v. AdelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Brenman v. DemelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API