Legal Opinion

Starner v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1951No. 34497PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs, Roy W. Starner and Mollie Starner, against the city of Oklahoma City and Harlan E. Chase, city engineer, to enjoin further proceedings in the establishment of a limited access facility in Oklahoma City. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition of the plaintiffs, and plaintiffs appeal.

The petition alleges that on October 25, 1949, the city council of Oklahoma City adopted a resolution purporting to establish a limited access facility on East or Eastern avenue from its intersection with Northeast Fourth street to its intersection with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Shinn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Holt v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rath v. Maness Ex Rel. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Smith v. Bovaird Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Buxton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Garrett v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Garrett v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API