Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1992No. 1911630, 1911693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

These petitions for writs of mandamus ask this question: Is the assignment or transfer, pursuant to Administrative Order No. GO-92-1, of civil cases filed in the Birmingham Division of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, to the “equity division” of that circuit, authorized under Alabama law?

Samuel Boykin and Apon, Inc. (“Boy-kin”), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Arthur J. Hanes, Jr., of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, to vacate his order of July 8, 1992, which transferred their action against Arthur Andersen & Company, et al. (“Andersen”), to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holsemback v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. United Supply Co. v. HINTON CONST. & DEV., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API