Berringer v. Lake Superior Iron Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The question in this case is one of the burden of proof. The plaintiff declared on the common counts, and on the trial sought to recover upon a. quantum meruit for the labor of himself and his teams and servants. He was a witness on his own behalf, and testified to the performance of the labor, and to its value. The labor was performed in sinking a shaft for mining. According to his evidence it was at first proposed that the work should be done under special contract, and he had assented to this, but afterwards refused to go on under the contract because the shaft was located where he thought…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ingalls v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Stewart v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Peck v. HoughtalingMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Milligan v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Bly v. BradyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Miller v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Drake Coal Co. v. CrozeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. United StatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1898