Legal Opinion

Etenburn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 2011No. SD 30503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge.

Charles S. Etenburn (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. 1 He claims the motion court clearly erred in concluding that the plea court had jurisdictional authority to amend the written judgments in his three criminal cases to omit Movant’s placement in the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) shock incarceration program in accordance with section 559.115.3 and in concluding that, even if the amendments were improper, Movant nevertheless did not suffer any resulting prejudice. 2 We determine that the motion court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Zinna v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Mertens v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Huth v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Benford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Etenburn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBERT L. CAMPBELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API