Kearney v. Washington Nat. Ins.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBowen, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The plaintiff insured bases his right: to maintain this action upon the principle stated in the following quotation from Corpus Juris : “If the company wrongfully cancels a policy or repudiates it, insured or the beneficiary, as the case may be, may treat flic contract as broken and at once maintain an action at law to recover damages for the breach.” 32 C.J. 1264, § 464.
The cases of Viglas v. New York Life Ins. Co., 78 F.(2d) 829 (C.C.A. 1st) and Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Geher, 50 F.(2d) 657 (C.C.A. 9th), both relied upon by plaintiff, permitted the insured to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1932
- Parks v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1932
- Ætna Life Ins. v. GeherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Wyll v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1933
- Viglas v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCann v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964