Legal Opinion

FRANCIS RILEY and JULIE RILEY

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 20, 2021No. 4:11-bk-31978Unknown

1Opinion

Dated: May 20, 2021 Bonde Perf) — 2 Brenda Moody Whinery, Chief Bankruptcy 3 5 6 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 8 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 In re: Chapter 7 FRANCIS RILEY and JULIE RILEY, Case No. 4:11-bk-31978-BMW 11 Debtors. RULING AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO CLASSIFY RORY 12 RILEY’S EQUITABLE ATTORNEY’S FEES AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE 13 CLAIM (DKt. 65) 14 15 This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Motion to Classify Rory Riley's Equitable Attorney’s Fees as an Administrative Expense (the “Motion’’) (Dkt. 65) filed by Rory John Riley 17]| (‘Rory’) on February 12, 2021, as supplemented…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. In Re David Abercrombie, Debtor. David Abercrombie v. Hayden Corporation, Dba Hillman Properties NorthwestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API