Legal Opinion

Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1994No. Docket No. 150190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Before: Shepherd, P.J., and Marilyn Kelly and J. H. Gillis, Jr.,* JJ. Shepherd, P.J.

Petitioner, Consolidated Aluminum Corporation (Conalco), appeals as of right from a July 26, 1991, judgment of the Tax Tribunal, which reinstated an earlier tribunal judgment *225of November 13, 1986, which, in turn, affirmed a March 29, 1982, assessment of tax deficiency by respondent, the Department of Treasury, against Conalco. This Court considered the November 13, 1986, judgment in Docket No. 96966 and, in an order issued on November 17, 1989, remanded the case to the Tax Tribunal for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gillette Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Trinova Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wismer & Becker Contracting Engineers v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Con. Alum. Corp. v. Treas Dep'tMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. New Covert Generating Company LLC v. Township of CovertMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API