Trinova Corp. v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
In this case we are called upon to determine the proper standard for the granting of tax base apportionment relief under § 69 1 of the Single Business Tax Act, MCL 208.1 et seq.; MSA 7.558(1) et seq., when a taxpayer claims that the apportionment provisions of the act fail to fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer’s business activity within this state. The Court of Appeals in Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp v Dep’t of Treasury, 145 Mich App 405; 377 NW2d 397 (1985), lv den 424 Mich 895 (1986), determined that § 69 apportionment relief is appropriate when any one element of the taxpayer’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. BairSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Gillette Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Henderson v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.