Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1925No. 24,343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

An affidavit in three counts was filed against appellant, on which this prosecution was based. He filed a motion to quash each count for the alleged reason that neither count stated facts sufficient to cqnstitute a public offense. The motion was overruled and defendant excepted, after which he was tried by a jury and found “guilty of violating the liquor law as charged in the affidavit and each count thereof,” and judgment was rendered that he be fined $500 and imprisoned four months at the state farm, that the liquor and utensils seized should be destroyed, and the automobile forfeited to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Crabbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Haverstick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Asher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Powell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holguin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API