McDaniel v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
An affidavit in three counts was filed against appellant, on which this prosecution was based. He filed a motion to quash each count for the alleged reason that neither count stated facts sufficient to cqnstitute a public offense. The motion was overruled and defendant excepted, after which he was tried by a jury and found “guilty of violating the liquor law as charged in the affidavit and each count thereof,” and judgment was rendered that he be fined $500 and imprisoned four months at the state farm, that the liquor and utensils seized should be destroyed, and the automobile forfeited to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Crabbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Haverstick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Asher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Powell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holguin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971