Legal Opinion

Damicus v. Kelly

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1931No. 27381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberly, , J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of the provisions of the Nebraska “bulk sales” statute. Comp. St. 1929, sec. 36-501. It appears that certain actions were brought by one Peter Damicus to recover the rental accruing to him under the terms of a written lease with one Nelson and one Smith for the period January to November, 1928, inclusive. Judgments were entered for the plaintiff. Subsequently garnishment proceedings in aid of execution were had in which Patrick H. Kelly and Edward J. Kelly appeared and were examined as garnishees. Thereafter, challenging the answers of these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Fire Insurance v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Punteney-Mitchell Manufacturing Co. v. T. G. Northwall Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Interstate Shirt & Collar Co. v. WindhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Fitzhugh v. MunnellOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ParkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwank v. County of PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hadley v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Botsford v. HolcombNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API