Legal Opinion
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance v. Extended Stay America, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 2, 2007No. 1-06-1310, 1-06-1386, 1-06-1478 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Extended Stay America (ESA), Inc., filed numerous lawsuits against Weather-Tite, Inc. (Weather-Tite), and Quaker Window Products Company, Inc. (Quaker), after purchasing allegedly defective windows. Two of Quaker’s insurers, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (Crum & Forster) and Diamond State Insurance Company (Diamond State), through counterclaims, sought a declaration that they did not have an obligation to defend or indemnify Quaker in the windows cases. The trial court dismissed the counterclaims on the grounds that (1) it lacked personal jurisdiction over certain ESA entities…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- M.F.A. Mutual Insurance v. CheekIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Kostal v. Pinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sabados v. Planned Parenthood of Greater IndianaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- McGinley Partners, LLC v. Royalty Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Village of Ringwood v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- In Re Objection to 2005 Tax LevyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- McGinley Partners, LLC v. Royalty Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.