Serio v. Hevesi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Malone, J. (dissenting).
I would affirm the quashing by
Supreme Court of the Comptroller’s subpoenas.
The courts have long held that the role of the Superintendent of Insurance as liquidator must be distinguished from his role as the state officer in charge of regulating the insurance industry (see e.g. Corcoran v Hall & Co., 149 AD2d 165, 173 [1989]; Corcoran v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 143 AD2d 309, 310-311 [1988]; Matter of Ideal Mut. Ins. Co., 140 AD2d 62, 67-68 [1988]; Matter of Kinney, 257 App Div 496, 501 [1939], affd 281 NY 840 [1939]). Specifically, cases have held…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sebastian v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re the Arbitration Between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & HolzNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Corcoran v. Frank B. Hall & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- G. C. Murphy Co. v. Reserve InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Matter of Clark v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.