Langelier v. Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
The issue in this case is whether an application of Florida’s implied consent law, § 316.1932, Fla.Stat. (1987), violated a driver’s constitutional rights, where the police assumed that the driver’s unwillingness to undergo a blood alcohol test before speaking with an attorney was a refusal to submit to such test. Because we do not recognize the constitutional rights asserted by the driver, we affirm the district court’s order denying habeas corpus relief.
A Belleair, Florida police officer stopped Philippe Serge Langelier, the petitioner-appellant, on suspicion of driving under the influence…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roberts v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Pamela A. McVeigh v. Earl SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Langelier v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- McCall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.