Legal Opinion

Langelier v. Coleman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 20, 1988No. 88-3124PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether an application of Florida’s implied consent law, § 316.1932, Fla.Stat. (1987), violated a driver’s constitutional rights, where the police assumed that the driver’s unwillingness to undergo a blood alcohol test before speaking with an attorney was a refusal to submit to such test. Because we do not recognize the constitutional rights asserted by the driver, we affirm the district court’s order denying habeas corpus relief.

A Belleair, Florida police officer stopped Philippe Serge Langelier, the petitioner-appellant, on suspicion of driving under the influence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Pamela A. McVeigh v. Earl SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Langelier v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. McCall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API