Schmitt v. Gibson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant.
The complaint states an action in assumpsit for money had and received to the use and benefit of plaintiff by defendant Gibson, John Doe, Jane Doe, and Richard Doe. No service-was had and no appearance made by the defendants sued under the fictitious names inserted in the complaint. Gibson, answering for himself alone, denied the allegations of the complaint.
The findings are voluminous, and consist of a narration of facts connected with a fake pugilistic encounter which one-Maxwell, a cousin of Gibson, had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Stewart v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Abbe v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Webb v. . FulchireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- Wright v. StewartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haruko Takeuchi v. SchmuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Wallace v. OpinhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Brooks v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Robertson v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- National Stone Tile Corp. v. VoorheisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.