Legal Opinion

Prussian National Insurance v. Peterson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1902No. 3,532PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom Jay Circuit Court; J. M. Smith, Judge. Action by Isaac PetersoD against the Prussian National Insurance Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee recovered judgment in his action against the appellant, a foreign insurance company, upon a policy of insurance against loss by fire. There were four paragraphs of complaint, and the appellant’s demurrer to each of them for want of sufficient facts was overruled.

The appellant, in discussing the complaint and its several paragraphs, objects thereto on the ground that it nowhere alleges that the appellee was the owner of the prop*290erty injured by fire at the time of the loss. The policy bore date of the 7th of Tune, 1899, and thereby the appellant insured the appellee for the term of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Indiana Insurance v. CapehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ætna Insurance v. ShryerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Providence Washington Insurance v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Draper v. Delaware State Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
  4. Theriault v. California InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. National Fire Insurance v. GellmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API