Legal Opinion

Max M. v. Thompson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 1, 1983No. 82 C 6575PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER BUA, District Judge.

This case presents claims under the Education For All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA), 1 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (§ 504), 2 the equal protection and due process clauses of the fourteenth amendment, 3 the Illinois School Code, 4 and the Illinois State Constitution. 5 The plaintiffs are Max M., a child handicapped within the meaning of the EAHCA, and his parents. The defendants consist of three different groups, designated the State Defendants, the Intermediate Defendants, and the Local Defendants. 6

In Count I, plaintiffs allege violations of the EAHCA,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Max M. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  2. Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Max M. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Eftekhara v. Illinois Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API