Max M. v. Thompson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER BUA, District Judge.
This case presents claims under the Education For All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA), 1 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (§ 504), 2 the equal protection and due process clauses of the fourteenth amendment, 3 the Illinois School Code, 4 and the Illinois State Constitution. 5 The plaintiffs are Max M., a child handicapped within the meaning of the EAHCA, and his parents. The defendants consist of three different groups, designated the State Defendants, the Intermediate Defendants, and the Local Defendants. 6
In Count I, plaintiffs allege violations of the EAHCA,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Max M. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Max M. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Max M. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Eftekhara v. Illinois Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.