Legal Opinion

Bell v. Vanlandingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 25, 1994No. 1930063PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hollis Ray Bell and his wife Helen Bell brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. John A. Vanlandingham. The jury returned a verdict for Dr. Vanlandingham. The Bells moved for a new trial on the ground that the trial judge had erred by declining the Bells' request to strike three jurors for cause. The court overruled their motion for new trial, and the Bells appealed.

The dispositive issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to dismiss for cause three jurors, Wood, Turk, and Kornegay.

In a recent case this Court reiterated that well-established rule of law "that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knop v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Roberts v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Wright v. Holy Name of Jesus Med. CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruner v. CawthonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Boykin v. KeeblerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Randolph v. ER Arkansas, P. A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Bell v. VanlandinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Boykin v. KeeblerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API