Legal Opinion
Haas v. Pittsburgh National Bank
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 6, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 72-968PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
This is a consumer class action brought by plaintiff, Mary D. Haas, individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated, against defendants Pittsburgh National Bank (PNB), Mellon National Bank and Trust Company (Mellon) and Western Pennsylvania National Bank (WPNB), to recover statutory damages for alleged violation of the National Bank Act (12 U. S.C. §§ 85, 86), the Pennsylvania Goods and Services Installments Sales Act (69 P.S. § 1101 et seq.), the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965 (7 P.S. § 301 et seq.) and the Truth-In-Lending Act (15…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Fred Fisher, on Behalf of Himself and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. First National Bank of Omaha, Omaha, NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Carpenter v. Suffolk Franklin Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.