Chiles v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:
In this expedited appeal, Florida alleges it is injured by the United States’ failure to enforce the immigration laws. The State asserts claims under both the Administrative Procedure Act and the United States Constitution. Florida asks for equitable restitution of its unreimbursed expenses or for declaratory relief and an injunction requiring the United States to fulfill its statutory and constitutional duties. The district court dismissed all counts, concluding the claims presented nonjusticiable political questions. For the reasons as set forth in the district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Caucus v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.