Legal Opinion
Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. Glickman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 30, 1996No. Civil Action 96-00408PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . 48
BACKGROUND. 49
DISCUSSION. 51
I. THE COURT SHALL DENY THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY STANDING TO CHALLENGE THE AGENCY’S ACTIONS AND OMISSIONS.51
A. The ALDF Lacks Standing To Sue On Behalf Of Its Members.52
B. The ALDF Has Constitutional And Statutory Standing To Sue In Its Own Capacity With Respect To Count IV.53
C. Roseann Circelli, Mary Eagan, And Marc Jumove Have Constitutional And Statutory Standing To Sue With Respect To Count…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Animal Leg Def Fund v. Glickman, DanielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.