Legal Opinion

Midland Acceptance Corp. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1934No. 4514PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

A motion» for a new trial was filed in time and under Boedker v Warren E. Richards Co., 124 Oh St, 12, this entry became merely a finding. The final judgment of the court appears therefore in the conclusion of the entry overruling the motion for a new trial, as follows:

“Wherefore it - is ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant for the sum of Seven Hundred and Twenty and no/T00 ($720.00) • Dollars, with interest at 6% from January 13, 1932 and for costs.
"To all of which defendant excepts.”

An examination of the record shows that the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harbaugh v. UtzOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Schievelbein v. BoosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API