Legal Opinion
Midland Acceptance Corp. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1934No. 4514PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
A motion» for a new trial was filed in time and under Boedker v Warren E. Richards Co., 124 Oh St, 12, this entry became merely a finding. The final judgment of the court appears therefore in the conclusion of the entry overruling the motion for a new trial, as follows:
“Wherefore it - is ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant for the sum of Seven Hundred and Twenty and no/T00 ($720.00) • Dollars, with interest at 6% from January 13, 1932 and for costs.
"To all of which defendant excepts.”
An examination of the record shows that the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Harbaugh v. UtzOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Schievelbein v. BoosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952