Legal Opinion

Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1966No. 3PublishedCited by 324 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The Communist Party of the United States of America failed to register with the Attorney General as required by the order of the Subversive Activities Control Board *72sustained in Communist Party of the United States v. SACB, 367 U. S. I.1 Accordingly, no list of Party members was filed as required by § 7 (d) (4) of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 993-994, 50 U. S. C. § 786 (d)(4) (1964 ed.).2 Sections 8(a) and (c) of the Act provide that, in that circumstance, each member of the organization must register and file a registration statement; in default thereof, § 13 (a)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Quinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by324 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

319 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API