Legal Opinion
Kopec v. City of Elmhurst
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 18, 1998No. 96 C 2585PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEVIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a prospective candidate for a full-time police officer position with Defendants, sues Defendants, alleging violation of the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Pending is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants Defendants’ motion.
PERTINENT BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Richard Kopec (“Kopec”) was born on July 17, 1949. (Def.l2(m) ¶ 1; PI. 12(n) Resp. ¶ 1.) In July of 1985, upon appointment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richard T. Kopec v. City of Elmhurst, a Municipal Corporation, and Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of ElmhurstCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- KXTV, LLC v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Richard T. Kopec v. City of Elmhurst, a Municipal Corporation, and Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of ElmhurstCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999