Legal Opinion

Conner v. City of Dillon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2012No. DA 11-0483PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 Justin and Susan Conner appeal from the District Court’s July 25, 2011 order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Dillon and dismissing the action with prejudice. We reverse.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶2 The City of Dillon owns a water main line that diverts water from Rattlesnake Creek, as it has done since the early 1900s. At the time of this action only ten residences receive water from this line and all are located outside the Dillon city limits. In 1981 the City entered an agreement with Robert and Patricia McNeill allowing them to connect to the Rattlesnake Creek…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grimsrud v. HagelMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gliko v. PermannMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Weidow v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Schmidt v. Colonial Terrace AssociatesMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Somont Oil Co., Inc. v. NutterMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Roman Catholic ChurchMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bashiti v. Tutu Park, Ltd.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Gopher v. 20th Judicial District CoMontana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API