Legal Opinion

Gabriel v. Gabriel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 4, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On petition for divorce. On application to open decree nisi. Heard on petition and affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

The application to open the decree nisi will be denied. The main object of the provision of the statute, delaying for six months final decree upon decree nisi, was to afford some opportunity for protection of the court and the state against decrees which were collusive or fraudulent -decrees. It was not intended by this provision for the two decrees to give a defendant who really believed he had a defence the advantage of delaying it until the case against him had been first presented before a master and decree nisi thereon, and then give an opportunity for making the entry of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. DunningNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887
  2. Larsen v. PetersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1894
  3. Bluestone Bldg. Loan Assn. v. GlasserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Toothe v. BryceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  5. Greer v. Van MeterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API