Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Peterson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Heard on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The object of this bill is to establish and protect complainant’s right in, and enjoyment of, an easement.

The circumstances, which are not open to serious dispute, are peculiar. For some years prior to and on the 1st day of June, 1893, Mrs. Elizabeth Mabey, of Montclair, Essex county, was the owner of a lot of land fronting on Elmwood avenue, in that ■city, upon which was a double frame dwelling, comprising, under -one roof, two complete dwellings, separated only by an ordinary lath and plaster partition, without any openings. Some years before that date she had procured a well…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Povey v. ReadyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Gabriel v. GabrielNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Methonen v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pilar v. Lister Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Boylan v. Loy Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  4. Blumberg v. WeissNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. West v. ProbstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API