Legal Opinion
United States v. Remmer
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 10, 1954No. 12177PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOUIS E. GOODMAN, District Judge,
(sitting by special designation).
Pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court, 347 U.S. 230, 74 S.Ct. 450, a hearing was had in the above entitled court at its court room in Carson City, Nevada, on June 7, 8, and 9, 1954 for the purpose of determining whether or not the “incident complained of”, and described in the opinion of the Supreme Court, 347 U.S. 228, 74 S.Ct. 450, 452, was harmful to the petitioner, i. e., defendant Remmer.
The government assumed the burden of proceeding with the evidence. The court heard the testimony of 27 witnesses—
12 members of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. CompagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Wheaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Enrique Godoy v. Marion SpearmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Arthur Krause v. James A. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Darrell Ewing v. Connie HortonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Brooks v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.