Legal Opinion

Mook v. City of Martinsville, Virginia

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided June 5, 2025No. 4:23-cv-00028Unknown

1Opinion

0/5/2025, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Cm POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION DANIEL P. MOOK, ) Plaintiff, Case No. 4:23-cv-00028 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION CITY OF MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA, By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen and G. ANDREW HALL, ) United States District Judge Defendants. This matter is before the court on Defendant G. Andrew Hall’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff Daniel Mook’s Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) interference claim. The court will deny Hall’s motion because genuine disputes of material fact remain as to whether Hall interfered with Mook’s FMLA…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API