Legal Opinion

Rehoboth Heights Development Co. v. Marshall

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 1, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The contract of sale obligates the vendor to convey a good marketable', fee-simple title clear of all incumbrances. The sole objection to performance of the contract made by the defendant vendee is that the title tendered him is not a good marketable one. The record title in the complainant and its predecessors is conceded to be good as far back as July 7, 1887, when one TreDennick purchased a tract including the blocks in controversy at a judicial sale in execution of a judgment upon foreign attachment obtained by him against Curtis, Hughes and Fallon. The land was seized and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greenblatt v. . HermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Hogan v. KurtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Greffet v. WillmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. De Mill v. MoffatMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Brown v. DavisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. LoperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1949
  2. Monbar, Inc. v. MonaghanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  3. Giammatteo v. PennaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API