Rehoboth Heights Development Co. v. Marshall
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The contract of sale obligates the vendor to convey a good marketable', fee-simple title clear of all incumbrances. The sole objection to performance of the contract made by the defendant vendee is that the title tendered him is not a good marketable one. The record title in the complainant and its predecessors is conceded to be good as far back as July 7, 1887, when one TreDennick purchased a tract including the blocks in controversy at a judicial sale in execution of a judgment upon foreign attachment obtained by him against Curtis, Hughes and Fallon. The land was seized and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greenblatt v. . HermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hogan v. KurtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Greffet v. WillmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- De Mill v. MoffatMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Brown v. DavisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. LoperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1949
- Monbar, Inc. v. MonaghanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Giammatteo v. PennaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929