Legal Opinion
Van Rossum v. Baltimore County
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 4, 2016No. CIVIL NO. JKB-14-115PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
James K. Bredar, United States District Judge
Dianne K. Van Rossum (“Plaintiff’) brought an action against her former employer, Baltimore County, Maryland (“Defendant”), alleging that Defendant (through its agents) violated provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59), filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of -Civil Procedure. The issues have been briefed (ECF Nos. 59-1, 60 & 61), and no hearing is required, see Local Rule 105.6…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Iko v. ShreveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cook v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Scipio v. Fairfield CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019