Legal Opinion
Judi Patrizi v. Scott Huff
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2012No. 11-4168PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Judi Patrizi (“Patrizi”) initiated suit against Cleveland police officers Scott Huff (“Huff’) and Thomas Connole (“Connole”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that they arrested her for obstructing official business in violation of Cleveland Ordinance § 615.06(A) without probable cause in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Huff and Connole appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment on qualified-immunity grounds arguing that they did have probable cause to arrest Patrizi or, in the alternative, the fact that they lacked…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cheryl D. Lyons v. City of Xenia, Christine Keith, Officer Matthew Foubert, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Ingram v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Shase Howse v. Thomas HodousCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Glenda Smith v. City of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Cody Jones v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Parma v. OdoleckiOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.