Legal Opinion

United States v. Hayes

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1927No. Nos. 7119, 7163, 7166PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

In pursuance of the Treaties of 1826 (7 Stat. 286), 1832 (7 Stat. 366), and 1833 (7 Stat. 417), the *875United States issued a patent, dated August II, 1852, to the Muscogee or Creek Tribe of Indians to a large body of land which included portions of the Arkansas river and of its tributary, the Cimarron river. This grant was to the Creeks as a nation and not to the individual members of that tribe. Treaty, 7 Stat. 417, 419; patent, paragraphs “Art. Ill” and “Art. IV” and the granting clause. This grant was in the nature of a defeasible or terminable fee, being “in fee simple…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Rector v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API