First National Bank v. How
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Scott county, Cadwell, J., denying a motion for the appointment of a receiver.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant, and on July 15, 1895, it instituted supplemental proceedings against her. Upon her disclosure in such proceedings the plaintiff moved the district court for the appointment of a receiver of certain money in her hands .for the purpose of applying it to the payment of the plaintiff’s judgment. This motion was opposed by the defendant on the ground that the fund or money so in her hands was exempt. The court denied the motion on that ground, and from its order the plaintiff appealed.
The further material facts, as they appear from the record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- In re HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- In re HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Brown v. BalfourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by13 opinions
- Winters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Olsen v. Board of Control of State InstitutionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Auto Owners Insurance v. BerkshireAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.