State Ex Rel. Crabtree v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Relator argues that the bureau policy at issue lacks statutory authority and is unconstitutional. Relator presents a compelling argument that the bureau’s policy violates the Due Process Clause, Section 16, Article I, and the Equal Protection Clause, Section 2, Article I of the Ohio Constitution because it denies State Fund claimants the oral pre-termination hearing before a district hearing officer that employees of self-insured employers receive. However, when a case can be decided on other than a constitutional basis, we are bound to do so. State ex rel. Hofstetter v. Kronk (1969), 20 Ohio…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Hofstetter v. KronkOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Burrows v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Burrows v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.